mnava18 wrote:

quick question , why is this strict 2pl?

 

w1(x),r2(x),w2(x),c2,c1

 

i thought c1 would have to come first , since it was written first. unless its a mistake , since i got this from your online lecture and the slides dont update very fast. so if you modified this example , it didnt show up on the video.

That's not Strict 2PL, I think that was a mistake.

I wrote down this from the lecture:

w1(x),r2(x),w2(x),c2,c1 (Not Strict 2PL)

w1(x), c1, r2(x), w2(x), c2 (Strict 2PL)

mnava18 wrote:

yeah i thought the 2nd one was the correct way. its hard to follow those videos sometime when the side screen doesnt update with what hes writing lol. thank you

No problem!