Author | Message |
---|---|
kaancalstatela
Posts: 52
|
Posted 19:26 Jun 05, 2016 |
Hello everyone, I'm going through Locking videos to make sure the concept really sinks in. But I realized I solved 4a) before I started getting into locking. So the example I've came up with for a serializable schedule that is non-serial does not involve any locks. I've proved it by interleaving certain transactions in a way that doesn't cause conflicts and/or the precedence graph is acyclic. I was wondering if that would be acceptable or an example involving locks would be a better solution. Thank you very much.
|
cysun
Posts: 2935
|
Posted 19:32 Jun 05, 2016 |
You don't need locking operations in 4(a). |
kaancalstatela
Posts: 52
|
Posted 19:37 Jun 05, 2016 |
Alright, thank you Professor. |