reset password
Author Message
se1k1h1mawar1
Posts: 121
Posted 21:23 Feb 23, 2015 |

Could anybody show me where I would find the "link to examples" in below context (the lab5 instruction)?
So sorry if it is obvious or somebody has asked about it already.

Overload the + operator as a binary operator to add together two
Polynomial objects. See the homework page for a link to examples.

raywu64
Posts: 44
Posted 21:28 Feb 23, 2015 |
se1k1h1mawar1 wrote:

Could anybody show me where I would find the "link to examples" in below context (the lab5 instruction)?
So sorry if it is obvious or somebody has asked about it already.

Overload the + operator as a binary operator to add together two
Polynomial objects. See the homework page for a link to examples.

I don't think it's there, but I think it's just adding like terms.

se1k1h1mawar1
Posts: 121
Posted 21:29 Feb 23, 2015 |
raywu64 wrote:
se1k1h1mawar1 wrote:

Could anybody show me where I would find the "link to examples" in below context (the lab5 instruction)?
So sorry if it is obvious or somebody has asked about it already.

Overload the + operator as a binary operator to add together two
Polynomial objects. See the homework page for a link to examples.

I don't think it's there, but I think it's just adding like terms.

Okay. Thank you for your reply.

jwarren6
Posts: 56
Posted 22:15 Feb 23, 2015 |

I could not find what he was talking about examples in the homework page. I figured it was just like all the other times we overloaded the +operator, that is take a Polynomial and add it to another Polynomial and the answer is returned as a third Polynomial that is the addition of both Polynomials. By the way, don't forget to allow for adding different-sized Polynomials. I hope that helped you a little bit.

Last edited by jwarren6 at 22:16 Feb 23, 2015.
kknaur
Posts: 540
Posted 06:45 Feb 24, 2015 |

Sorry.   I completely forgot to post the link.  It is there now.

se1k1h1mawar1
Posts: 121
Posted 06:49 Feb 24, 2015 |

Thank you for all of your replies. 
The instruction was already clear anyways.