Author | Message | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
aligh1979
Posts: 121
|
Posted 01:37 Oct 20, 2010 |
Hi professor , could you please one more time clarify the problem number 4.20 c , e (guess both are sort of the same) , I do not get it exactly . thank you here is the c) Q : the sections that were larger than the avererage section size for their year | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
cysun
Posts: 2935
|
Posted 08:49 Oct 20, 2010 |
Consider the following data:
The average section size in 2010 is (30+15+10)/3 = 18.3, and the average section size of 2009 is 25. For (c), the results should be
For (e), the results should be
Last edited by cysun at
08:50 Oct 20, 2010.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
aligh1979
Posts: 121
|
Posted 04:08 Oct 23, 2010 |
I am still thinking about the C part , I have got the first table with each section and year and their size(students) , and another query with each year , section id and the average of the section_size . I just do not know how to connect them , since if I use having , the second part of the condition is not just one value , it is a column of average size for each year . and I just do not know how to compare each separate year with the average of that year , not just a single value? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
cysun
Posts: 2935
|
Posted 08:35 Oct 23, 2010 |
Use a join. |