Author | Message |
---|---|
alomo
Posts: 70
|
Posted 09:25 Mar 27, 2010 |
(Refer to the User-Item Matrix on slide 8 of the lecture)
If some user (Nan) didn't rate some particular item (item 6), why shouldn't we consider that user's rating history in calculating of correlation coefficient? After all, we did not include the item 6’s information in our calculations for Ken-Lee correlation coefficient. For example, if Lee, for some reason, rated item 6 with high rating, it wouldn’t change the coefficient. |
cysun
Posts: 2935
|
Posted 10:53 Mar 27, 2010 |
I don't quite understand your question, so let me give you a general answer.
Second, the predicted rating of an item X by a user Y is based on the ratings of the users who have rated this item. In the example in the notes, Nan didn't rate Item 6, so when we predict Ken's rating on Item 6, we only consider Lee and Meg. |
alomo
Posts: 70
|
Posted 19:53 Mar 27, 2010 |
I understand that for the prediction we must use only history of those users who rated item 6. My question was only about the correlation coefficient. In the lecture you said that we don't need to calculate the similarity for Ken-Nan based on the fact that Nan didn't rate item 6. Even so, Ken and Nan do "share" history for other four items and it makes sense seeing their similarity. |
cysun
Posts: 2935
|
Posted 23:03 Mar 27, 2010 |
You can calculate the coefficient of Ken-Nan, but it is unnecessary if you just want to predict the rating of item 6 by Ken. |
alomo
Posts: 70
|
Posted 10:22 Mar 28, 2010 |
I see your point. Thank you. Last edited by alomo at
10:23 Mar 28, 2010.
|